Category Archives: Opinion

ICE is out of control (OPINION)

by Angel Maravilla Chavez

Immigration enforcement has become a global issue that often violates the rights of immigrants, especially Hispanics. Many are forcibly taken and sent back to their home countries. This has led to protests, as immigrants feel their rights are being stripped away, resulting in violence.

A tragic incident occurred on January 7, 2026, in Minneapolis, when a 37-year-old woman named Renee Good was fatally shot by an ICE enforcement officer. This incident quickly garnered widespread attention, revealing the harsh realities of immigration enforcement.

In my opinion, the enforcement actions by ICE are horrific. It’s distressing to witness Hispanic individuals live in fear as agents break down their doors, taking away their rights and essentially kidnapping them, which violates the 14th Amendment. The situation is even more alarming when ICE enforcers target schools, taking Hispanic children in the same way they do adults. The methods employed by these officers are truly frightening. They are typically armed and show no restraint in apprehending Hispanic individuals.

I believe that we need a different approach to immigration policy in this country, one that respects the human rights of immigrants and is guided by compassion and understanding, not fear and hate.

Dangers of technology should be taken seriously

by Amori Matthews

Some people believe that technology is the key to our growth or success. However, I believe that it causes us to be too dependent on it. Technology can be a good thing but I think it has caused more problems rather than simply making our lives easier. Many people want to talk about the growth and the good of technology but they don’t list all the problems that come along with using technology.

The University of the People article, “Society Is Too Dependent On Technology,” claims that it is about the negative effects but it doesn’t really go into detail, making it seem like not a big deal. The author states that “Technology can be a powerful tool when used correctly.” I believe they say this to downplay the negative effects and portray them as minor and easy to control. The article also uses innuendo by saying that technology use “can reduce face-to-face communication,” sort of hinting at social damage without arguing about the long-term consequences or effects. Additionally, when the author states, “studies show that technology affects how people think and behave”, the author does not cite any sources–trying to make the statement seem factual without any evidence to back it up.

UA Grantham’s “Technology: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly” kind of does the same thing. They also talk about some of the problems technology can cause but considers them as small, manageable, or unimportant. The author describes serious issues such as “privacy loss” and “cyber security threats” but refers to them as “challenges of the digital age”, minimizing the potential harm caused by these problems. This article also uses innuendo when the author states, “society is increasingly becoming more and more reliant on technology”, suggesting that we are too dependent but without fully going into detail about it. Furthermore, I think the author uses a lot of truth surrogates–for example, “Technology has transformed nearly every aspect of our modern life.” This claim has little to no evidence to back it up but people agree with it automatically without calling it into question.

Lastly, The United Nations article, “Impact Of Digital Technologies,” strongly supports technological advancements while limiting the discussions of its risks. While the article does mention unequal access to technology, it goes right back to the benefits, using innuendo, downplayers, and truth surrogates. The author downplays global inequalities by stating that “digital technologies are made to accelerate progress towards sustainable development”, basically treating them as secondary issues. The UN also uses innuendo when it claims that “countries that fail to adopt digital technologies are at risk of being left behind.” This statement suggests that if you don’t improve your technology or follow global trends you’re basically irresponsible. Finally, the author uses truth surrogates, stating that “digital technologies are transforming societies worldwide.” Even though this claim is broad and authoritative, it still lacks evidence as to how technology is transforming different societies worldwide.

In conclusion, while I still think technology is bad and causes more problems than good, many people and companies will have different opinions. While I still think people should talk more about the downsides and actually have studies to back up their claims or reasoning, I think people only see the good in technology since it makes everything easier to manage and do.

Cell phone ban is unfair (OPINION)

by Zander Hatzigeorgalis

Baltimore City Public Schools began enforcing a new policy this school year where mobile phones are banned from being used in schools from bell to bell during the school day. The ban is being enforced in every public school in Baltimore City and is part of a growing trend that is spreading to many school districts across the United States.

Many teachers are against this policy and a lot of students are as well. Many students will get sneakier with using their phones, but their phones will be taken away if they are caught using them.

This phone policy has gotten out of hand. Let’s say if I had an accident in my pants and needed to text my father to tell ask him to bring me a new pair. An administrator would take my phone away from me. No matter how many times I tell them why I need to use it, they do NOT care.

Phones are not even allowed during lunch. As someone who cannot handle loud noises, I need headphones to help me in noisy environments like the cafeteria. Sometimes I feel too mentally drained to even communicate with other students. If I were to text my father about something, I would need to go into the bathroom stall, which I hate, since bathrooms aren’t always the cleanest.

I am a student who struggles with school, not because of my phone or headphones, but because it’s hard to focus in some classes due to how poorly the teachers teach me and how boring the classes are. I personally think that the students who struggle like I do should have music playing in their headphones during individual work time or should be allowed to just glance at their phone to look at the time without their phones being taken by the administrators.

I feel like people focus on the wrong thing rather than the actual bad stuff out in the world like students taking their own lives, school shootings, our rights being stripped away, and so much more, and yet they’re worried about phones being a “distraction”? I really think this is so damn unfair. I abhor everything about the phone policy and I abhor how people focus on phones rather than on traumatizing things that cause Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). There are other distracting things out there–for example, there is this one student in my class who can never shut up.

Phones aren’t the problem. The School Board should end the ban on cell phones and start focusing on the issues that really matter.

Women should have the right to choose an abortion (OPINION)

Pro-Choice demonstration from 2018 (Photo: Paul Becker – Wikimedia Commons)

by Ashley Sarmiento Rodriguez

Abortion–let’s talk about it. Abortions are a choice all women in Maryland have if they get pregnant and they don’t want to keep it. Abortions are given in two ways: a pill you take or a surgery. Some types of abortion can’t be performed after a certain amount of time of the fetus being formed.

In my opinion, it’s good that women have ways to at least choose whether or not to have a kid because there are a lot of woman who get pregnant without planning and don’t really have stable income or homes to give to a baby so they do what they know is best and get an abortion.

I understand that many people are strongly against abortion and say women should keep their babies, but at the end of the day, the people with all those opinions aren’t actually the one who will be having to take responsibility for these babies, so they honestly shouldn’t have a say in the decision of any woman who chooses to have an abortion. Also, no woman should be shamed or looked down on because they had an abortion. It should be an option for all pregnant woman and nobody–especially no man–should even think they have a say in what a woman can do with her own body.

A woman’s right to choose used to be protected by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, but in 2022 that ruling was overturned, giving state governments the power to ban abortions. I’ve been researching this issue and I’ve seen that there are a lot of states where abortions are banned or heavily restricted, such as Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Tennessee, Missouri, etc. I find that so upsetting that all these places have banned something so many woman need. Why keep producing more humans to be raised by people who aren’t ready to be responsible for taking care of a kid or kids? It’s just better to at least have a solution for women who know they can’t raise a child and for women to have a say in what they want.

Transgender people are valid (OPINION)

By Zander Hatzigeorgalis 

Transphobia is a huge problem here at Patterson and in the world. Transphobia means that a person is prejudiced against transgender people. One example of a transphobic act is purposely calling a transgender person by a name or pronoun that they do not identify with. Instead of respecting someone’s gender identity, transphobes insist that a person is the gender that matches the biological sex of the body they were born into.

I say this transphobic behavior has to stop! In my experience, I’ve been harassed about being FTM (female to male). The people who always said I was not a boy kept saying I was a girl no matter how many times I corrected them that I am not a girl. Transgender people have feelings too. They are valid as who they are.

I always give respect to others but in return most people do not respect me at all. Transgender people take a while to process their transitions (especially as teenagers) and it takes a few years to fully change the testosterone and estrogen hormones. For me, it took forever just to convince my dad to cut my hair shorter than it used to be. When transphobia happens, the transgender people feel very uncomfortable and unsafe.

Transgender people have gender dysphoria every day and it does not feel very good. Gender dysphoria refers to psychological distress that results from an incongruence between one’s sex assigned at birth and one’s gender identity. I have the biggest gender dysphoria ever. It ain’t even funny. I experience this feeling every day, all day. There is no reason to add to the stress that transgender people already experience by being disrespectful to them.

Making fun of transgender people is not cool at all. It causes a lot of emotional damage to FTMs (female to males) and MTFs (male to females). I have been called offensive slurs before. Listen to the transgender people who say a word is offensive to them, like the “T” slur. When transgender people say it, it’s fine for them, but when others say it without knowing the real meaning of it, it is offensive.

Everyone wants to be respected for who they are. Gender identity is a very complex and personal thing, but if we just listen to what people tell us about themselves and treat everyone the way that we would want to be treated, the world will be a better place.

Patterson should get rid of its uniform policy (OPINION)

by Ashley Sarmiento Rodriguez

Patterson High School has had a school uniform policy for years and many students, including myself, don’t agree with it.

One reason why Patterson High School made students start wearing uniforms is because there used to be a lot of students who would go into neighborhoods and mess around and do disturbing things and with the uniform you’d be able to identify where they are coming from. Another reason they added the uniforms is because there were some students wearing inappropriate clothes. The main reason why they made uniforms is to stop outsiders who don’t belong here from coming in.

However, I think that’s dumb because the school used to make us scan ID cards before coming in and if you don’t scan, you can’t come in–so why stop now? It’s so much more reasonable to do that than to require students to wear uniforms, because anybody can wear a Patterson shirt and khaki pants and pass as a student. That could be even more dangerous because as long as you are wearing anything from Patterson, teachers think you’re from here. Besides, there are many people still in the school not wearing uniforms despite the uniform policy existing, so if they really wanted to see if anybody was coming in who shouldn’t, they still can’t tell.

I disagree with the uniform policy. I think that’s not fair that because of certain students wearing things they shouldn’t, the whole school needs to basically get punished for the actions of a few. Yes, they can say it’s for identification, but there are IDs that can hang around our neck and many other ways to identify Patterson students beside uniforms.

I think they should take uniforms away or make it optional because not everyone wants to wear the same pants every day or the same two shirts all week and many students can’t afford to buy additional uniforms. If someone decides to wear something inappropriate, then let them get punished on their own because what a handful of students do should not result in the whole school is getting punished.

Another reason why I don’t agree with the uniforms is because they’re just short sleeve shirts. The building is cold and even when people are wearing hoodies under the uniform shirt, school staff members ask you to take it off. For now, they’ve run out of the uniform sizes and only have big clothes that don’t fit me. Why would I or anyone want to wear that every day?

Yet another reason why I don’t agree with the uniform policy is that this year they have been making it a much bigger priority than it was the year before and not everyone is able to go before school even starts to pick up their uniform. Then, when we’re actually in school trying to get them, it’s much harder. I didn’t have anything for the first few days of school and went around asking for the uniform but they never had right sizes. Then if I wanted to get any Patterson hoodies or sweatpants, I’d have to pay them myself. They don’t even give out the khaki pants now that school started; I have to go buy my own. There are just a lot of things that not everyone has transportation or money to get.

My friend, Yeimmi, another student who goes to Patterson High School, also does not agree with the school uniforms.

“I don’t like the uniforms because they have only given me a big shirt that doesn’t fit me and I’ve been yelled at a few times to change at school.”, she said. “It’s uncomfortable.”

“I didn’t have time to go get the uniform before school even started and since then I’ve only gotten an XXL shirt.”, Yeimmi added. “I feel like they’re useless and there’s no point in having them. It makes no difference.”

For all these reasons, I think that Patterson should get rid of its uniform policy and let students have the freedom to wear what they want, as long as it doesn’t violate the District’s dress code.

Homework doesn’t work (OPINION)

by Wilfredo Portillo-Quinones

Being assigned homework after school for is often stressful for students. Being given work for HOME after coming back from school seems illogical. Spending seven hours a day studying and doing assignments is already a lot for most students.

Teachers seem to assign homework to students in order for them to learn more and understand topics they’re studying, but this seems lazy, if students are being taught this at school, why do they need to spend more time doing homework in order for them to learn or give teachers a better understanding of their skill level if they’re already giving that effort in school?

According to the Florida Department of Education, “Homework teaches students that they may have to do things—even if they don’t want to.” I think that is an example of misuse of time. If we genuinely want students to get into real world stuff, we should be doing it at school. There should be more said and done at school than at home. Putting a lot of stress on students will drain them mentally, driving them away from learning and education as a whole. It’s already enough for them to get up early and go to school and exhaust their brains. Giving them more work after school just seems exhausting and very unnecessary. Teachers should take time in class to see if their students are understanding lessons and not expect students to give them a review with homework.

To build character in students, teachers should be working hands on in order to understand them and see how they grasp most ideas. Some teachers should put more effort into understanding students individually, the same way they’d check our homework to see that improvement or understanding of where most students are at. A lot of teachers love to be hands-on with students in order to actually see where they are at in terms of learning and understanding the lessons they are currently learning and working on. If more teachers did this, it would help students feel better at school and feel more supported by their teachers, because a lot of the work students do nowadays is pretty much on computers and a lot of students aren’t really built for stuff like that. Most students would rather talk to another person or be taught with actual spoken words than with what a computer, textbook, or worksheet shows. This would improve education a lot more than homework and give more students helpful ideas and a better understanding of their current work.


School lunch needs improvement (OPINION)

by Wilfredo Portillo-Quinones

School lunch is a very important part of school and a major topic that needs to be discussed. Currently, school lunch at Patterson is not enough, nor is it nutritious.

I think we should improve our school lunches because it would benefit everyone. It’s something a lot of our students come to school for. When lunch is good, it is one of the most enjoyable parts of school. I think improving school lunch would bring more students to Patterson, because the quality of school lunches is a factor behind children and teenagers changing schools. If we were to improve the lunches, we’d be able to promote that as one more reason why young people should enroll at Patterson.

Whenever people talk about school, one of the most common topics that come up is school lunch and whether it’s good or not. I think it would be beneficial for us to add more food to the plates or give it some sort of improvement that could bring in more students. It would also be nice to add more nutrients to our lunches because a major health factor is whether or not we get enough nutrients in our school lunches.


By improving school food, we should go off of the suggestions made by our students about what they want, specifically the students who usually eat at school. A lot of times students don’t have food at home and they come to school to eat and have lunch. When they don’t get enough or the food is bad, they end up not eating enough, and it’s sad. Although it isn’t the schools problem, we want our students to feel good at school and feel like they have more reasons to come. Another major point of this would be including healthier foods, like more salad bars or fresh fruit.


I think the best way for our school to understand and change would be to have a poll where students can vote on whether or not we should change and improve the school lunches or keep them the same. I think it would be very popular once students understand the changes, because we’re so used to school lunches in their current state. A major change would stir up a lot of activity for our school.

These are the main reasons why our schools should improve school lunches. A lot of us want these changes made and there are many programs working for these kinds of improvements in schools across the country.

« Older Entries